Long–term straw retention drives carbon sequestration and crop productivity in dryland soils C sequestration

Main Article Content

Stephen Yeboah Shirley Lamptey Renzhi Zhang

Abstract

Higher population densities in rural areas and climate change have necessitated technical change in crop production. Intensification without causing degradation is required to cope with changing population dynamics.  A study was conducted to assess the influence of tillage systems on crop yield and soil carbon balance in a long-term spring wheat?field pea rotation in a rain–fed semiarid Loess Plateau environment. Experimental work included the following treatments: conventional tillage with straw removed (T), no till with straw removed (NT), no till with straw retention (NTS) and conventional tillage with straw incorporated (TS). Straw treated soils resulted in decreased soil temperature and increased soil moisture  compared to soils with straw removed. No tillage with straw retained treatments produced the highest average grain yield of 1809 kg ha–1 on average than that of conventional tillage with straw removed (1280 kg ha–1) and no till with straw removed (1337 kg ha–1). No tillage with straw retained and conventional tillage with straw incorporated had positive soil C balance, but the effect was greater on no tillage plots. The lower C inputs under treatments witht straw removed translated into negative soil C balance. NTS farming practices demonstrated sustained increases in soil quality and crop productivity, whiles treatments with straw removed reduced carbon inputs in dryland cropping system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yeboah, S., Lamptey, S., & Zhang, R. (2018). Long–term straw retention drives carbon sequestration and crop productivity in dryland soils. Advances in Agricultural Science, 6(4), 60-71. Retrieved from http://aaasjournal.org/submission/index.php/aaas/article/view/97
Section
Articles

References

Andruschkewitsch R, Geisseler D, Koch HJ, Ludwig B. 2013. Effects of tillage on contents of organic carbon, nitrogen, water–stable aggregates and light fraction for four different long–term trials. Geoderma, 192: 368–377.
Blake GR, Harte KH. 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute, A. (ed.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Second edition. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin USA, 363 – 375.
Bolinder MA, Janzen HH, Gregorich EG, Angers DA, Van–denBygaart AJ. 2007. An approach for estimating net primary productivity and annual carbon inputs to soil for common agricultural crops in Canada. Agricul, Ecosys. Environ. 118: 29–42.
Chinese Soil Taxonomy Cooperative Research Group. Chinese Soil Taxonomy (Revised Proposal). Institute of Soil Science/Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Academic Sinica/Beijing, 1995.
Donald CM. 1962. In search of yield. Journal of Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 28: 171–1787
FAO. 1990. Soil map of the world: revised legend. World Soil Resources Report 60. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Ghoshal N, Singh KP. 2010. Impact of addition of various resource quality inputs on soil CO2 flux and C balance in a tropical dryland agroecosystem. 2010. 19 World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World 1 – 6, Brisbane, Australia
Huang GB, Zhang RZ, Li GD, Li LL, Chan KY, Heenan P, Chen W, Unkovich MJ, Robertson MJ, Cullis BR, Belloti WD. 2008. Productivity and sustainability of a spring wheat–field pea rotation in a semi–arid environment under conventional and conservation tillage systems. Field Crop Res. 107(1):43–55.
Lal R and Pimentel D. 2009. Biofuels: Beware crop residues. Science (Washington DC), 326:1345–1346. doi:10.1126/science.326.5958.1345–c.
Lal R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma, 121:1–22
Li D, Liu M, Cheng Y, Wang D, Qin J, Jiao J, Li H, Hu F. 2011.Methane emissions from double–rice cropping system under conventional and no tillage in southeast China. Soil and Till. Res, 113: 77–81.
Regina K, Alakukku L. 2010. Greenhouse gas fluxes in varying soils types under conventional and no-tillage practices. Soil Till. Res, 109 (2):144–152.
Russell AE, Cambardella CA, Laird DA, Jaynes DB, Meet DW. 2009. Nitrogen fertilizer effects on soil carbon balances in Midwestern U.S. agricultural systems. Ecological Applications, 19(5):1102–1113
Rustad LE. 2006. From transient to steady-state response of ecosystems to atmospheric CO2-enrichment and global climate change: conceptual challenges and need for an integrated approach. Plant and Ecology, 182: 43–62.
Wu QS, Liu HX, Wang L, Deng CB. 2016. Evaluation of AMSR2 soil moisture products over the contiguous United States using in situ data from the International Soil Moisture Network. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 45:187–199. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2015.10.011
Yeboah S. Lamptey S. Zhang R. Li LL. Conservation Tillage Practices Optimizes Root Distribution and Straw Yield of Spring Wheat and Field Pea in Dry Areas. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2017, 9 (6). ISSN 1916-9752 E-ISSN 1916-9760. doi:10.5539/jas.v9n6pxx
Yeboah S, Zhang R, Cai L. L. Li, J. Xie Z, Luo J. Liu J. Wu. Tillage effect on soil organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon and crop yield in spring Wheat–field pea rotation. Plant Soil Environ, 2016. 62:279-285. doi:10.17221/66/2016-PSE
Zhang A, Bian R, Pan G, Cui L, Hussain Q, Li L, Zheng J, Zheng JJ, Zhang X, Han X, Yu X. Effects of biochar amendment on soil quality, crop yield and greenhouse gas emission in a Chinese rice paddy: A field study of 2 consecutive rice growing cycles: Field Crops Research, 2012, 127:153–160.
Zhang QZ, Yang ZL, Wu WL. Role of crop residue management in sustainable agricultural development in the North China Plain. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2008, 32: 137–148.
Zou H, Ye X, Li J, Lu J, Fan Q, Yu N. Effects of straw return in deep soils with urea addition on the soil organic carbon fractions in a semi–arid temperate cornfield. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (4): e0153214. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153214.