Conceptual Design and Feasibility Study of a Multi-Feed Integrated Biomass Conversion System

Main Article Content

Saeed Ghanbari Venkatesh Meda Catherine Hui Niu

Abstract

Biomass is recognized as a potential source for sustainable production of fuels. Forestry residuals has been used for the small-scale production of biodiesel since early 1800s. However, the biofuel market has not been suitable in recent decades due to the pronounced drop in the worldwide price of petroleum. In addition, environmental issues, low reactor yield, and uncertainties in biomass feedstock have challenged process design engineers. Hence, extensive research has been reported to address these issues. Pyrolysis and gasification processes can produce a wide range of fuels, chemical, solvents, and other valuable products from biomass. Scholars attempted to optimize various operating parameters, find innovative approaches to increase the reaction yield, and develop novel product upgrading techniques such as bio-oil upgrading; yet, limited studies were focused on implementation of these methods for a multi-feed integrated biomass production plant. Recent findings have created the foundational blocks for design of high-tech integrated biomass conversion systems. This paper is focused on conceptual design and feasibility study of such systems incorporating the strategies and technologies at hand. The available biomass conversion technologies for different feedstocks are combined in this design. To this end, a new plant is designed and simulated in ASPEN PLUS simulator using ASPEN Economic Analyzer to perform an economic analysis. Techno-feasibility results suggest that this plant is not profitable even after incorporating the new technologies and optimizing the system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ghanbari, S., Meda, V., & Niu, C. (2018). Conceptual Design and Feasibility Study of a Multi-Feed Integrated Biomass Conversion System. Advances in Agricultural Science, 6(2), 01-24. Retrieved from http://aaasjournal.org/submission/index.php/aaas/article/view/54
Section
Articles

References

Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels, N.R. Council, Canada.
2. Michael Hiete, J.L., Christian Bidart, Frank Schultmann Challenges for Sustainable Biomass Utilization. in Proceedings of the Chilean-German Biociclo Workshop 2009. Karlsruhe, Germany.
3. Klass, D.L., Biomass for renewable energy, fuels, and chemicals. 1998: Academic press.
4. Crocker, Thermochemical conversion of biomass to liquid fuels and chemicals, ed. 1. 2010: Royal Society of Chemistry.
5. Amigun, B., J. Gorgens, and H. Knoetze, Biomethanol production from gasification of non-woody plant in South Africa: Optimum scale and economic performance. Energy Policy, 2010. 38(1): p. 312-322.
6. Dasappa, S., Potential of biomass energy for electricity generation in sub-Saharan Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2011. 15(3): p. 203-213.
7. Mamphweli, N.S. and E.L. Meyer, Implementation of the biomass gasification project for community empowerment at Melani village, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Renewable Energy, 2009. 34(12): p. 2923-2927.
8. Purohit, P., Economic potential of biomass gasification projects under clean development mechanism in India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009. 17(2): p. 181-193.
9. Soleymani, M. and K.A. Rosentrater, Techno-Economic Analysis of Biofuel Production from Macroalgae (Seaweed). Bioengineering, 2017. 4(4): p. 92.
10. Kang, A. and T.S. Lee, Converting sugars to biofuels: ethanol and beyond. Bioengineering, 2015. 2(4): p. 184-203.
11. Mirmoshtaghi, G., BIOMASS GASIFICATION IN FLUIDIZED BED GASIFIERS. 2016.
12. Rupesh, S., C. Muraleedharan, and P. Arun, ASPEN plus modelling of air–steam gasification of biomass with sorbent enabled CO 2 capture. Resource-Efficient Technologies, 2016. 2(2): p. 94-103.
13. Hou, K. and R. Hughes, The kinetics of methane steam reforming over a Ni/?-Al 2 O catalyst. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2001. 82(1): p. 311-328.
14. Fatoni, R., et al. Modeling Biomass Gasification in a Fluidized Bed Reactor. in Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on industrial engineering and operations management. Bali, Indonesia. 2014.
15. Eikeland, M.S., R. Thapa, and B. Halvorsen, Aspen Plus Simulation of Biomass Gasification with known Reaction Kinetic. 2015.
16. Akhlas, J., F. Ruggerib, and A. Bertuccoa, Simulation of Steam Gasification of Coal with PreCombustion enabling Cleaner Coal Conversion. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2015. 43.
17. Abdelouahed, L., et al., Detailed modeling of biomass gasification in dual fluidized bed reactors under Aspen Plus. Energy & Fuels, 2012. 26(6): p. 3840-3855.
18. Dai, J., et al., Gasification of woody biomass. Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering, 2015. 6: p. 77-99.
19. Saskatchewan’s forestry sector final report. 2016.
20. Guidelines for bioenergy production. 2016; Available from: www.bioenergyadvice.com.
21. Annual Production numbers report. 2016, Saskatchewan Scrap Tire Co.
22. Canada Animal Waste Management Guide Committee report, C.C.O.A. Engineering, Editor. 1972.
23. Crop report, G.O.C. Ministry of Agriculture, 2016.
24. Hinchee, M., et al., Short-rotation woody crops for bioenergy and biofuels applications, in Biofuels. 2011, Springer. p. 139-156.
25. Mokhatab, S. and W.A. Poe, Handbook of natural gas transmission and processing. 2012: Gulf professional publishing.