Comparison of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Mapping the Qualitative Properties of Soil

Main Article Content

Mohammad Ali Nikpey Mahdi Sedighkia Mohammad Bagher Nateghi Javad Robatjazi


The high proliferation rate of population and their over growing demands for foods that rely on environment and natural resources resulted in evaluation and recognition of more inputs, in particular soil and water resources. In this regard, mapping the soil properties is considered as well-adopted approach to provide fundamental information related to land resources. As a branch of applied statistics, geostatistics uses the collected information sampled location to provide a broad range of estimates concerning the land properties in unsampled locations. In the present study, we evaluated the performance of estimates kriging, inverse distance weighting, and Cokriging to map some of the soil quality properties in chat fields of Golestan province located in northern part of Iran. We measured percentage of clay, silt, sand, calcium carbonate, organic carbon, and concentrations of micronutrients such as iron, copper, zinc, manganese, and concentrations of macronutrients including nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus as main parameters affecting the soil quality. Sampling was performed on grids 250 × 250 meters in 35 points of the depth of 20 cm. After data normalization, experimental semivariograms was drawn. For Kriging and Cokriging estimation we utilized spherical, exponential, circular, and Gaussian models, and to estimate variables using Inverse Distance Weighting, the parameters of 1-5 power was used. Kriging method was found to the two other methods for estimation of soil properties under study. For the estimation of electrical conductivity and soil’ iron content, the Kriging and Cokriging showed the best estimation of results. However, to estimate the other parameters of soil (sand, organic carbon, pH and lime) inverse distance weighting method with power one was found to have the least error leading to the best interpolation. Finally, considering the best method of interpolation, zoning maps of soil quality properties was created in the GIS.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nikpey, M. A., Sedighkia, M., Nateghi, M. B., & Robatjazi, J. (2017). Comparison of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Mapping the Qualitative Properties of Soil. Advances in Agricultural Science, 5(3), 01-15. Retrieved from


Acerbi Júnior, F.W., Silveira, E.M.d.O., Mello, J.M.d., Mello, C.R.d. and Scolforo, J.R.S. 2015. Change detection in Brazilian savannas using semivariograms derived from NDVI images. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 39(2): 103-109.
Azpurua, M.A. and Ramos, K.D. 2010. A comparison of spatial interpolation methods for estimation of average electromagnetic field magnitude. Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, 14: 135-145.
Behera, S.K. and Shukla, A.K. 2015. Spatial distribution of surface soil acidity, electrical conductivity, soil organic carbon content and exchangeable potassium, calcium and magnesium in some cropped acid soils of India. Land Degradation & Development, 26(1): 71-79.
Black, C.A., Evans, D. and Dinauer, R. 1965. Methods of soil analysis (Vol. 9): American Society of Agronomy Madison, WI.
Bouyoucos, G.J. 1962Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy journal, 54(5): 464-465
Cahn, M., Hummel, J. and Brouer, B. 1994. Spatial analysis of soil fertility for site-specific crop management. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58(4): 1240-1248.
da Silva, A.F., Barbosa, A.P., Zimback, C.R.L., Landim, P.M.B. and Soares, A. 2015. Estimation of croplands using indicator kriging and fuzzy classification. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 111: 1-11.
Dai, F., Zhou, Q., Lv, Z., Wang, X. and Liu, G. 2014. Spatial prediction of soil organic matter content integrating artificial neural network and ordinary kriging in Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Indicators, 45: 184-194.
Davis, B.M. 1987. Uses and abuses of cross-validation in geostatistics. Mathematical geology, 19(3): 241-248.
Deutsch, C.V. and Journel, A.G. 1998. Geostatistical software library and user’s guide. Oxford University Press, New York.
Gerstmann, H., Doktor, D., Gläßer, C. and Möller, M. 2016. PHASE: A geostatistical model for the Kriging-based spatial prediction of crop phenology using public phenological and climatological observations. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 127: 726-738.
Hassani-pak, A. 1998. Geostatistics. Tehran: University of Tehran: Persian
Hohn, M. 2013. Geostatistics and petroleum geology: Springer Science & Business Media.
Isaaks, E.H. Srivastrava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics: Oxford University Press NY.
Jou, A. 1978. Selected methods of soil analysis. Int. Inst. Trop. Agricult., Ibadan, Nigeria.
Klute, A. and Page, A.L. 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis: Chemical methods (Vol. 3): American Society of Agronomy.
Legendre, P. and Legendre, L.F. 2012. Numerical ecology (Vol. 24): Elsevier.
Lu, G.Y. and Wong, D.W. 2008. An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique. Computers & Geosciences, 34(9): 1044-1055.
Mubarak, I., Mailhol, J.C., Angulo-Jaramillo, R., Ruelle, P., Boivin, P. and Khaledian, M. 2009. Temporal variability in soil hydraulic properties under drip irrigation. Geoderma, 150(1): 158-165.
Nourzadeh, M., Mahdian, M.H., Malakouti, M.J. and Khavazi, K. 2012. Investigation and prediction spatial variability in chemical properties of agricultural soil using geostatistics. Archives of agronomy and soil science, 58(5): 461-475.
Odeh, I.O., McBratney, A. and Chittleborough, D. 1995. Further results on prediction of soil properties from terrain attributes: heterotopic cokriging and regression-kriging. Geoderma, 67(3-4): 215-226.
Oliver, M. and Webster, R. 2014. A tutorial guide to geostatistics: Computing and modelling variograms and kriging. Catena, 113: 56-69.
Pizzato, J.A., Araújo, D.V., Galvanin, E.A., Júnior, J.R., Matos, Â.N., Vecchi, M. and Zavislak, F.D. 2014. Geostatistics as a methodology for studying the spatiotemporal dynamics of Ramularia areola in cotton crops. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5(15): 2472.
Qu, M., Li, W. and Zhang, C. 2014. Spatial distribution and uncertainty assessment of potential ecological risks of heavy metals in soil using sequential Gaussian simulation. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 20(3): 764-778.
Robinson, T. and Metternicht, G. 2006. Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 50(2): 97-108.
Schelin, L. and Sjöstedt-de Luna, S. 2014. Spatial prediction in the presence of left-censoring. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 74: 125-141.
Shakouri, K.M., Shabanpour, M., Asadi, H., Davatgar, N. and Babazadeh, S. 2011. Evaluation efficiency spatial interpolation techniques in mapping organic carbon and bulk density paddy soils of Guilan.
Sys, I.C., Van Ranst, E., Debaveye, I.J. and Beenaert, F. 1993. Land evaluation (Part I-III). Crop Requirements. 199p. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Brussels. Belgium.
Uyan, M. 2016. Determination of agricultural soil index using geostatistical analysis and GIS on land consolidation projects: A case study in Konya/Turkey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 123: 402-409.
Uyan, M. and Cay, T. 2013. Spatial analyses of groundwater level differences using geostatistical modeling. Environmental and ecological statistics, 20(4): 633-646.
Voltz, M. and Goulard, M. 1994. Spatial interpolation of soil moisture retention curves. Geoderma, 62(1-3): 109-123.
Voltz, M. and Goulard, M. 1994. Spatial interpolation of soil moisture retention curves. Geoderma, 62(1-3): 109-123.
Wang, Y. and Shao, M. 2013. Spatial variability of soil physical properties in a region of the Loess Plateau of PR China subject to wind and water erosion. Land Degradation & Development, 24(3): 296-304.
Warrick, A. 1980. Spatial variability of soil physical properties in the field. Applications of soil physics: 319-344.
Yang, P., Mao, R., Shao, H. and Gao, Y. 2009. The spatial variability of heavy metal distribution in the suburban farmland of Taihang Piedmont Plain, China. Comptes rendus biologies, 332(6): 558-566.